Why Immigration Reform is Vital to America
— Farmworkers
SANTA FE, NM
(By
Judy
O'Meara,
The Jon Garrido Network)
July 16, 2011 — According
to the US
Department of Labor’s National Agricultural Workers
Survey (NAWS) about half of US crop workers have been
unauthorized for the past decade.
Since the
1990’s there has been a significant increase in demand
for fruits, vegetables, nuts and horticultural (FVH)
commodities. Each of these FVH segments had sales of
about $20 billion in 2010, and combined FVH sales of $60
billion were almost a third of the $195 billion in crop
sales. With California being the largest farming state,
their share of US farm sales increased alongside the
rising share of high-value FVH commodities. Today
two-thirds of their agricultural sales comes from FVH
crops.
This has
changed the faces of rural America attracting immigrants
to fill farm jobs because of the labor intensive nature
of producing such commodities. Because of the concern
about the availability of farm workers labor-saving
changes in some commodities (like increasing
mechanization in raisin harvesting) has been implemented
so the focus could be on greenhouses, nurseries, and
dairies, where labor-saving changes may be slower. This
shifting demand for hired farm labor may change the
debate on immigration reform and agriculture, since e.
g. horticulture and dairies are more widely dispersed
throughout the US than fruits and vegetables.
The change
in the immigrant movement has been transforming rural
and agricultural areas throughout the United States for
decades. Newcomers from Mexico and Central America fill
many of seasonal jobs especially fruit, vegetable
and horticultural crop farms as well as year-round jobs
in many dairy and livestock operations and farm-related
jobs in food processing and meatpacking.
(NAWS)
researchers have found most Hispanic or Latino
immigrants will remain in seasonal farm and farm-related
jobs for less than a decade before moving up the US job
ladder, often finding jobs in construction or services.
This is what happened when the US economy boomed and
unemployment fell in 2006-07. The revolving door that
brought Hispanics or Latino immigrants into farm jobs
quickly moved them on to nonfarm jobs thus generating
farm labor shortage complaints.
However (NAWS)
found during the recession of 2008-09 some ex-farm
workers moved down the job ladder, returning to the farm
work force after losing construction and other nonfarm
jobs. There were few farm labor shortage complaints.
Despite
the recession of 2008-09, the average number of weeks of
farm employment increased and the average hourly
earnings rose. The farm worker conditions improved,
including fewer new unauthorized entrants because of
stepped up border and interior enforcement.
The
increase wages brought about productivity advantages
from less worker turnover contributed to the H-2A
program expansion. Information compiled by the Global
Workers Justice Alliance — June 2010, the Department of
Labor issued 99,472 visas in from October 2008-Sept 2009
(of the H-2A seasonal agricultural workers visas 55,693
were for Mexican workers).
The
expansion included new areas and commodities such as
the Washington apple growers, California-Arizona
vegetable growers, and producers of fruits and
vegetables in the south-central states in response to
immigration enforcement actions and a quest for more
workers.
Even with
the demand for workers and the labor intensive
nature of (FVH), the prospect of comprehensive
immigration reform, is probably not going to happen in
2011-2012.
Instead
there are growing trends for more legislation like the
Texas’s HB3252 E-Verify
bill (introduced by Representative Warren Chisum), which
received the State Affairs Committee’s approval on May
6, 2011. This type of verification would require US
employers to submit data on newly hired workers to the
US Department of Human Services (DHS) and if the
employers continued to employ workers with suspect
documents they would risk fines.
One result
may be less stable employment for unauthorized workers
and their families. The increased fear in agricultural
communities from I-9 audits will prompt some workers to
circulate from one employer to another as they obtain
new false documents. With more state and local police
providing information on suspected unauthorized
foreigners to DHS, it could lead to detention and
deportation.
The major
immigration reform proposal that would affect farm
workers, farm employers and the rural communities is the
Agricultural Job Opportunity Benefits and Security Act (AgJOBS).
The bi-partisan AgJOBS would provide a path to legal
status for some unauthorized farm workers and revise the
H-2A temporary worker program to make it easier for farm
employers to employ legal guest workers.
On
May 14, 2009, Senator
Dianne Feinstein (D-CA)
and Representatives
Berman (D-CA) and Putnam
(R-FL) introduced the
S1038 & HR2414 AgJOBS in
the 111th Congress. The
S1038 version would have
allowed up to 1.35
million unauthorized
farm workers who did at
least 150 days or 863
hours farm work in the
24-month period ending
December 31, 2008 to
apply for Blue Cards
that would allow them to
work and live in the US.
The HR2414 version
stipulated the farm
worker would qualify by
doing 150 days or 863
hours of farm work or by earning at least
$7,500 from farm
work during the 24-month
qualifying period.
Although introduced,
neither has yet to
pass.
For those unfamiliar,
the H-2A program allows
US farm employers to
request certification
from the US Department
of Labor (DOL) to have
foreign workers admitted
temporarily to the
United States to perform
agricultural labor of a
temporary or seasonal
nature. Data is
available on the Foreign
Labor Certification Data
Center Online Wage
Library.
The US DOL
certification requires two
conditions are satisfied: (1) there are not sufficient
US citizens who are able, willing, and qualified, and
who will be available at the time and place needed, to
perform the labor or services involved in the employer
petition and, (2) the employment of the farmworker in such
labor or services will not adversely affect the wages
and working conditions of workers in the United States
similarly employed. If the AgJOBS had passed, the
changes to the H-2A program would have start one year
after the enactment.
The USDA
National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS)
estimates employment on US farms four times a year.
According to the NASS,
there has been enormous
growth in the immigrant
population. In 1970, the
10 million immigrants
were less than five
percent of US residents;
in 2010, the immigrant
share of US residents
had increased by 2.5
times to 13 percent,
reflecting a quarter
century of high
immigration.
Their
researchers find the largest single source of immigrants
is from Mexico with many others migrating from India,
Philippines and China.
In 1970,
when Mexico’s population was
48 million, there were 760,000 Mexican-born US
residents. By 2010, when Mexico had 112 million
residents, there were 12 million Mexican born US
residents.
Between
2007 and 2010, the number of unauthorized foreigners in
the US
dropped, reflecting the recession of 2008-09. There was
11.1 million unauthorized foreigners in 2005, a peak of
12 million in 2007, 11.6 million in 2008, 11.1 million
in 2009, and 11.2 million in 2010.
Unauthorized foreigners are dispersed throughout the US.
In 1990, California had 42 percent of the estimated 3.5
million unauthorized foreigners in the US, and the top
six states had 80 percent.
By 2010,
California’s share had fallen to 23 percent of 11.2
million unauthorized foreigners, and the same six
traditional immigration states had only 60 percent of
the total unauthorized population.
In many
“new growth” states for immigrants in the Midwest and
southeast, most recent immigrants are unauthorized.
The
US Department of Labor’s National Agricultural Workers
Survey (NAWS) has been interviewing farm workers over
the past two decades. Since 1989, 54,000 workers have
participated in the interviews.
The DOL
NAWS is the only federal survey that determines the
legal status of respondents. The NAWS was originally
designed to determine the supply or availability of farm
workers, since the Immigration Reform & Control Act
required monitoring the farm labor market to determine
if there were farm labor shortages. As determined, there
were no farm labor shortages during the period of
1989-93 for which the NAWS was mandated.
The NAWS
has continued to interview workers employed on US crop
farms and they currently generate socioeconomic data on
workers employed on US crop farms. The share of farm
workers who are unauthorized rose from 14 percent in the
early 1990s to peak at 54 percent in 2000 and fell to 48
percent in recent years.
Meanwhile,
the share of crop workers who are US citizens fell from
43 percent in the early 1990s to a low of 20 percent in
2000, and rose to 33 percent in recent years.
Among
foreign-born farm workers, the share in the US for more
than a decade has been rising, from about 45 percent to
55 percent between 2005 and 2008.
Most are
from Mexico and they traditionally came from west
central Mexican states. The share of US crop workers
from west central Mexico has been falling, while the
share from southern Mexican states has been rising, to
about 20 percent after 2005.
Many have
less than seven years schooling and about two-thirds
speak little or no English. Almost half of foreign-born
farm workers in the US who have at least 20 years speak
English well. Over half are married with approximately
25 percent of their children being born in the US.
Recent
interviews indicate a more stable crop work force with a
rising share of workers who report only one farm
employer during the year; over 80 percent reported only
one farm employer between 2007 and 2009, when workers
averaged 35 weeks of farm work.
Most of
the crop workers interviewed for the NAWS, almost 90
percent between 2007 and 2009, reported being hired
directly by a crop farmer; only 12 percent were hired by
labor contractors, down from 27 percent in the late
1990s.
Similarly,
over 80 percent of crop workers between 2007 and 2009
reported being paid hourly wages, versus 11 percent paid
piece rate wages.
The NAWS
interviews primarily workers employed in FVH crops.
During 2007 and 2009, 35 percent worked in fruits and
nuts, 23 percent worked in vegetables, and 20 percent
worked in horticulture, a total of 78 percent. The same
split in the late 1990s, but with more in fruits and
fewer in horticulture.
By task
when interviewed, a quarter of the workers between 2007
and 2009 were engaged in pre-harvest tasks, another
quarter were harvesting, and another quarter were
engaged in “technical tasks,” primarily work in
greenhouses.
The NAWS
collects personal and family earnings by income ranges,
such as $12,500 to
$14,999, the average farm earnings of workers
interviewed between 2007-2009.
The average wage being $9 an hour, $13,500 in farm
earnings suggest 1,500 hours of work. Average family
income from farm and nonfarm sources was $17,500 to
$19,999 between 2007 and 2009. A quarter of families had
incomes below the poverty line and a quarter reported
receiving needs-based public assistance.
The NAWS
paints a picture of a crop work force experiencing
rising wages and more weeks of farm work conditions
despite the recession of 2008-09.
The share
of workers interviewed by the NAWS with family incomes
below the poverty level has fallen sharply, from 56
percent in the mid-1990s to 23 percent between 2007 and
2009. Their educational level and English skills may
have remained the same, yet it has not kept them from
increasing their wages, weeks of work, and income.
The share
of US-born workers is almost 30 percent and rising,
weeks of farm work and real earnings are rising, and
average farm and family income is rising.
President
Obama’s Administration supports comprehensive
immigration reform, including stepped up border and
interior enforcement to detect and deter illegal
immigration as well as a path to legalization for most
of the unauthorized foreigners in the US while the House
Republicans prefer an enforcement-only approach to
unauthorized migration.
Obama’s
spring 2011 activities are widely seen in many media
reports as an effort to shift blame for the failure to
enact comprehensive immigration reform to Congressional
Republicans, who continue to assert that enforcement
must come before legalization. He believes the American
public is more prepared to endorse comprehensive
immigration reform to strengthen the US economy than
many members of Congress.
The
Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) Agency expects
to deport about 400,000 foreigners this fiscal year.
This is nearly 10
percent above the Bush administration's 2008 total and
25 percent more than were deported in 2007. The pace of
company audits has roughly quadrupled since President
George W. Bush’s final year in office.
According
to an article by Marcus Stern, 9/10/2010 in USA TODAY,
the number of immigrants removed by ICE
starting October 1, 2010 is fully 60% higher than in the
last year of the Bush immigration, and at least a third
(37%) higher than in the first year of Obama
administration.
The ICE efforts are part
of President Obama’s larger project "to make our
national laws actually work," as he put it in a speech
this month at American University. Partly designed to
entice Republicans to support comprehensive immigration
reform, the mission is proving difficult and politically
perilous.
Many
migrant farm worker advocates have asked President Obama
to suspend the deportation of foreigners who might
qualify for legalization under comprehensive immigration
reforms, especially unauthorized foreigners brought to
the US before age 16 who could have, under the DREAM
Act, became legal immigrants if they graduated from
college or served in the military.
Many
enforcement-minded House Republicans threaten to
initiate impeachment proceedings of the Obama
Administration if such actions were to have taken
place.
Deportation is a reality
for the 11.2 million
unauthorized foreigners
because Comprehensive
Immigration Reform is
nowhere in sight for
2011-12.
The U. S. Census Bureau
projects our population to increase by 50 million during
the period of 2000-2020, which is clearly the biggest
boost to food demand in the future.
The Hispanic or Latino labor
force is vital in sustaining our food supply. Without
them the supply may fall way short of the demand with
the end result being poorer quality and rising cost.
A recent study done by the
USDA Agriculture on the "US Household Looking Ahead
to 2020, Economic Research Service USDA Agriculture
Report No.821" reveals, the total food expenditures
Nationwide are projected to increase 26.3 percent
between 2000 and 2020 with the largest projected
increase in expenditures being for fruits, vegetables
and horticulture.
Avoiding Immigration Reform
may well be our downfall during the next decade unless
we realize the necessity for initiating change, before
it is too late.
Sources:
Immigration Reform Implications for Farmers, Farm
Workers and Communities — UCDavis.edu, University of
CA-Philip Martin, June 23, 2011.
California
Hired Farm Labor 1960-2010 Change and Continuity-From
Migration. UCDavis.edu, University of CA-Philip Martin,
30 Apr 2011.
USDA
Agriculture on the "US Household Looking Ahead to
2020, Economic Research Service USDA Agriculture Report
No.821"