WASHINGTON & SANTA
FE, NM (By
Darren Samuelsohn,
Politico)
October 6, 2011 ―
Energy Secretary
Steven Chu faces
questions over
whether his
laboratory smarts
and Silicon Valley
background have
undercut his ability
to operate inside
the Beltway.
Chu has kept a very
low profile during
the Solyndra affair,
traveling to China
and Vienna in
September and
speaking almost
exclusively on other
topics within his
domain as questions
pile up from
Congress about the
lost $535 million
loan guarantee. White House
spokesman Jay Carney
said Friday Chu
has "the president's
full confidence."
But Chu, the Nobel
laureate praised
last year for
spending weeks in a
Houston control room
brainstorming up
engineering ideas
that ultimately
helped cap the Gulf
of Mexico oil
gusher, is not out
of the woods. "Just because you
are a Nobel
Prize-winning
physicist doesn't
mean you'd be a good
orthopedic surgeon,"
said one former Bush
Energy Department
official. "They're
different skill
sets." "Impressive
credentials, but
sadly miscast for
the rough and
tumble, oft
unforgiving world of
oil and energy
markets and its cast
of malign actors,"
Raymond Learsy,
author of "Oil and
Finance: the Epic
Corruption," wrote
in a blog post
published Monday on
the Huffington Post. The GOP-led House
wants answers on how
Chu and the rest of
the administration
missed — or just
ignored — red flags
surrounding Solyndra
when it won the loan
guarantee and then
restructured the
terms of the loan
two years later so
that taxpayers were
on the hook if the
company defaulted. Rep. Cliff
Stearns (R-Fla.),
the subcommittee
chairman at the
center of the House
investigation, said
Friday Chu is
on very thin ice. "Chu obviously
must have known
about this," Stearns
told WLS radio in
Chicago. "If they
knowingly broke the
law here, that's a
serious problem. I
think for the
secretary, I'd like
him to testify what
he knew and when he
knew it." Carney said it's
no surprise Chu
would have made the
final call on the
loan guarantee. "Chu is the
head of that
department," Carney
said. "The
department, which
we've made clear,
where career
professionals have
administered the
program, reviewed
the loan
applications and
made the
recommendations. "Obviously,
ultimately the head
of that department
is responsible for
it," Carney added.
"But let's be clear
there were numerous
people involved who
were career
professionals and
worked on those
kinds of issues
every day." Hazel O'Leary,
who served as Energy
secretary for
President Bill
Clinton's entire
first term, said
despite Chu's
impressive resume,
Obama's transition
team advisers might
not have gotten it
right when they
picked him to run
the department. "Generally, if
you're in the first
administration, the
people advising the
senior folks in the
White House about
how to place folks
in jobs have very
little understanding
about what the
challenges of the
job are," said
O'Leary. An
environmentalist
with close ties to
the Obama
administration said
Chu didn't help his
cause with his own
staffing decisions,
picking people with
science and
technical
backgrounds over
people with solid
political and policy
chops. "On some levels,
it's exactly what
you'd like to
believe to be the
best team, the
environmentalist
said. “But in the
realities of this
town these days, you
need some people who
have a different
kind of intuition. "The great irony,
the big critique
with Solyndra is
the suggestion of
too much politics
and political
influence, when in
fact the realities
on this might be
exactly the
opposite, there
was too much science
and too little
intuition," the
person added. Among those who
fall into the
science/technical
heavy category, the
source said, are DOE
science deputy Steve
Koonin, a former
California Institute
of Technology
provost and BP chief
scientist; former
DOE stimulus
specialist Matt
Rogers, a McKinsey &
Co. energy
consultant; and
Chu’s former chief
of staff, Rod
O'Connor, who
advised Vice
President Al Gore
and had a deep
background in event
planning, including
running the 2000 and
2004 Democratic
National
conventions. Since his
appointment, Chu has
been candid about
his efforts to break
down red tape at DOE
and other government
agencies — including
the White House and
Treasury Department
— to get the loan
guarantees out the
door. High-ranking
Republicans, as DOE
often notes, have
been making the same
case for years,
including at Chu's
own Senate
confirmation
hearing. This week, Chu
spokesman Damien
LaVera said
the secretary took
responsibility for
giving the green
light to the Solyndra loan when
it got announced in
March 2009. Chu also
supported the change
in the loan terms as
part of a new
package
designed to give the
company at least a
fighting chance of
survival. House Republicans
have been demanding
someone step up on
both questions. They
called for DOE's
loan guarantee
office chief,
Jonathan Silver, to
be fired because
they thought he gave
evasive answers at a
recent hearing on
the Solyndra loan
process. For Chu, it's
unclear if any
explanation will be
acceptable to GOP
lawmakers who
envision there are
problems higher up
in the chain of
command. "It would be
interesting for him
to determine what
pressures from the
White House
existed," said
Nebraska Rep. Lee
Terry, a senior
member of the
Oversight and
Investigations
Subcommittee. Chu has his
defenders, people
who say DOE was
trying to do
transformational
things on clean
energy with record
sums of money going
out the door via the
stimulus, even amid
roller coaster oil
prices, the nation's
worst oil spill and
a nuclear crisis in
Japan that brought
the industry's
safety record under
considerable glare. "It's easy to
criticize a Cabinet
secretary," said
former Sen. Byron
Dorgan (D-N.D.).
"It's very hard to
do the job in these
circumstances. The
energy issues
confronting our
nation are
significant." "Everyone's
assumption was
he was going to come
in without any
political background
and have a really
tough time," said
Roger Ballentine,
president of the
consulting firm
Green Strategies. "I think he's
exceeded
expectations,
frankly. I've never
seen a period of 2½
years where the DOE
has been more
central to a broader
political dialogue.
That's not always
because of good
things. But this is
a secretary who's
been thrust into the
limelight from
circumstances in a
way few ever
have." But Ballentine, a
former Clinton White
House climate aide
and top
environmental
adviser to John
Kerry's 2004
presidential
campaign, said he
still wouldn’t be
surprised if Chu
wanted out.
"I do think his
credibility as a
scientist has served
him very well," he
said. "But there's
no question his
world fundamentally
changed when the
House changed
parties. The real
test for him,
frankly, is whether
there's much about
the job left to
enjoy."












